India joins the UNSC as a non-permanent member for two years in January. It promises to be a very feisty stint.
While non-permanent members do not have veto rights of the 5 permanent members, it does give them the chance to chair and preside over the many subsidiary groups of the organization and to initiate discussions on specific topics of interest. In this context, the timing of India’s membership this time, unlike say 2011-12, is important.
An increasingly fractious world order where multilateralism is under threat, differences between nations expanding and in the aftermath of the pandemic, fault lines glaringly exposed even among the permanent members of the UNSC, the next couple of years will go a long way in deciding the future of multilateralism in the world. India will have the opportunity to not only play an active role in the process but also push a few things of its own.
It has already begun back-channel deliberations to that end. Earlier this month, a delegation led by external affairs secretary Vikas Swarup met a delegation in Russia comprising deputy minister of foreign affairs of the Russian Federation, Sergey Vasilyevich Vershinin to discuss issues on the UNSC agenda and recent developments around the world.
“The Indian delegation briefed Russia on its priorities during its upcoming UNSC tenure and they decided to work closely together, given the common challenges faced and in keeping with their long-standing special and strategic privileged partnership,” said a statement by the ministry of external affairs.
While more details were not forthcoming, it is not difficult to see what these priorities would be. India has been at the forefront of calling for a reform of the UNSC including but not restricted to expanding the number of permanent members. Currently, the 5 members–US, UK, France, Russia and China–is more a reflection of the global power structure of the post World War II era of 1945 when the UNSC was founded, and does not represent the many changes that have taken place ever since. For years, countries like India, Germany, Brazil and Japan have been knocking in vain on the doors for a permanent membership.
In 2009, a group within the UN–Intergovernmental Negotiations (IGN) framework, was formed to look into possible reforms in the UNSC but very little progress has been made so far. In recent times, India has openly expressed its frustrations on the rigidity of the structure. Some of it has come from the absolute top levels of the government.
“Reform in the responses, in the processes, in the character of the United Nations is the need of the hour. It is a fact that the faith and respect that the United Nations enjoys in India are unparalleled. But it is also true that the people of India have been waiting for a long time for the completion of the reforms of the United Nations,” India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi had said in his address to the UN General Assembly in September. “The requirements and challenges of our present and future are vastly different from those of the past. The question is whether the character of the institution, constituted in 1945, is relevant even today? If century changes and we don’t, then strength to bring changes becomes weak. Today, people of India are concerned whether this reform-process will ever reach its logical conclusion?”
The main roadblock in the reform process is obvious–China. Given the UN’s constitution where a permanent member can single-handedly stall any process using its veto power, China has delayed deliberations in the IGN. It has also stalled India’s promotion as a permanent member even as the other four countries are in support of its candidature. Post Modi’s address, India launched a scathing attack on IGN in the UN General Assembly last month.
“Today’s Security Council is an impaired organ. It has been unable to act with credibility essentially due to its unrepresentative nature. It has become like a platform for debate in a University rather than a serious result-oriented process in the United Nations consisting of sovereign member states,” said T S Tirumurti, India’s permanent representative to the UN, at the UNGA last month. “Just a handful of countries don’t want us to proceed. They have stopped the IGN from progressing. They are using the IGN as a smoke-screen to stop themselves from being identified by paying lip-service to Security Council reform. The conditions they are laying out are impossible to fulfil which is a full consensus of all member states.”
“Without decisive movement, those who support real reform and wish to deliver on the commitment made by our leaders, will be forced to look beyond the IGN for results. If that happens, we must not hesitate in taking a relook at the IGN process itself,” Tirumurti added.
Caught in a time wrap, perhaps the UN has been most unfair to the world’s largest democracy. India under Modi is determined to correct that, which may also pave the way for the survival of the UN itself.
UK Ministers, Shadow Cabinet leaders, diplomats, business chiefs come together for India Global Forum’s grand Diwali Reception in London Read… Read More
At the India Global Forum’s (IGF) grand Diwali reception in London this week, UK Home Secretary Suella Braverman focussed her message of… Read More
Home Secretary Suella Braverman has said the UK is eager to secure a trade deal with India to boost both… Read More
Chandrasekhar also attended a session on the Future of Digital at the India Global Forum where he spoke on the… Read More
India Global Forum’s glittering awards ceremony with Guest of Honour, UK Chancellor Rishi Sunak, to mark the culmination of a… Read More
The UK government on Wednesday announced 75 fully-funded scholarships for Indian students to study in the UK, beginning September 2022,… Read More
View Comments